I suppose the grocer's apostrophe adds to the humor.Tero wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2024 6:45 pmhttps://www.threads.net/@debpixcom/post/C77RIssp3c4
evangenitals
![Smiling. :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin2.gif)
I suppose the grocer's apostrophe adds to the humor.Tero wrote: ↑Fri Jun 07, 2024 6:45 pmhttps://www.threads.net/@debpixcom/post/C77RIssp3c4
evangenitals
Fox News exit polls accidentally show Americans are liberal — They support abortion, gun control, government healthcare, and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
I mean, if we're going to get all hysterical and consider 60 killed and over 400 injured in a single incident to be a real problem, where does it end? The gun-grabbers have to be stopped before the 2nd Amendment is completely gutted!Expressing his opposition to a proposed bump stocks ban being considered in the U.S. Senate, Vance told reporters, "I think that we have to ask ourselves: What is the real gun violence problem in this country, and are we legislating in a way that solves fake problems? Or solves real problems? And my very strong suspicion is that the (Majority Leader Chuck) Schumer legislation is aimed at a PR problem, not something that's going to meaningfully reduce gun violence in this country.”
[source]
Then again he's right, the legislation is performative, and isn't something that's going to meaningfully reduce gun violence in the US.L'Emmerdeur wrote:It's heartwarming to see the younger Republican legislators stepping up to carry on the legacy of shitheels like Mitch McConnell as they slowly fade from the scene. Senator JD Vance, hoping to be Trump's pick for vice president, burnishes his image:
I mean, if we're going to get all hysterical and consider 60 killed and over 400 injured in a single incident to be a real problem, where does it end? The gun-grabbers have to be stopped before the 2nd Amendment is completely gutted!Expressing his opposition to a proposed bump stocks ban being considered in the U.S. Senate, Vance told reporters, "I think that we have to ask ourselves: What is the real gun violence problem in this country, and are we legislating in a way that solves fake problems? Or solves real problems? And my very strong suspicion is that the (Majority Leader Chuck) Schumer legislation is aimed at a PR problem, not something that's going to meaningfully reduce gun violence in this country.”
[source]
I disagree. To the extent that it would continue to keep bump stocks out of the hands of potential mass murderers like the loon who shot up the Las Vegas music festival, it is significant. Agreed that it wouldn't change the rate of killings via handguns and semi-automatic rifles, but Vance would oppose any moves in that direction as well.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:24 amThen again he's right, the legislation is performative, and isn't something that's going to meaningfully reduce gun violence in the US.
I guess I'd grant that considering the high number of injured and dead in Las Vegas, but at the same time it's only addressing a specific mechanical means in mass shootings rather than meaningfully addressing the issue as a whole - which is that it's trivially easy to act on that particular kind of impulse in the US.L'Emmerdeur wrote:I disagree. To the extent that it would continue to keep bump stocks out of the hands of potential mass murderers like the loon who shot up the Las Vegas music festival, it is significant. Agreed that it wouldn't change the rate of killings via handguns and semi-automatic rifles, but Vance would oppose any moves in that direction as well.Brian Peacock wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:24 amThen again he's right, the legislation is performative, and isn't something that's going to meaningfully reduce gun violence in the US.
My hypothesis is that if your brain is sufficiently addled by stupidity, the idea of a “reason” or “rationale” for your beliefs can be dismissed as a mere pretension of liberal academics. It’s not necessary. If you “know” in your gut that something must be true, then no further evidence is needed. This is what Stephen Colbert, in his prior persona as a fake Republican, defined as “truthiness”.
I’ve come to the conclusion that it was Reagan that gave the idiots all that power. Before that they were fine in their own idiot community and were mostly isolated from any diversity. Now even the red states employ “foreigners” for the lowest paying agricultural and food processing jobs.
I’d argue that it was natural changes in the makeup of the United States that forced the idiots out of their insular white-breaded world.
Reagan may have been president when these changes began to be large enough to be noticed by at least some of them, but he didn’t cause it.
I agree with you both. (I’m a born-and-raised Coastal Elite who has lived and raised a family in Flyover Country for 20 years, so I have a fairly informed perspective on this).
The forum is closed to all but members so link would be no use.I’d argue that it was natural changes in the makeup of the United States that forced the idiots out of their insular white-breaded world.
A new, permanent summer grocery program will help nearly 21 million kids across 37 states get enough to eat this year while school’s out.
But 13 states with Republican governors have opted out of the federal program, citing their opposition to what they deride as “welfare” and their unwillingness to cover administrative costs.
Under the new $2.5 billion program created by Congress, eligible low-income households will receive a total of $120 per child over the three summer months when school-based free and reduced-price lunch programs aren’t available.
Washington, D.C., several territories and tribal nations also are participating. Families making up to 185% of the federal poverty level, or $57,720 for a family of four, are eligible.
Funds have already been distributed to families in many states.
The money will be available on an electronic benefits transfer (EBT) card. Households enrolled in state-administered programs can use their benefits at retail stores that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps.
The states that chose not to participate in Summer EBT — Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Wyoming — could decide to opt in next year.
While Oklahoma is not participating in the program, the Cherokee and Chickasaw tribes in the state are. Fourteen states with Republican governors are participating in the program.
The money put on the digital cards comes from the federal government, but states must cover half the cost of administering the program. Those costs include the salaries and benefits of the people running the program, office expenses and outreach efforts.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 19 guests