Hi, I'm Mick

[pErvinalia]

So is non-sequitur'ing...

[Xamonas Chegwé]

Catholicism boasts some of the West's greatest thinkers, just so you know.

It's easy to boast.

[FBM]

A single person can have well-developed knowledge and skills in one area, and yet still be underdeveloped in others. Einstein's personal life left quite a bit to be desired wrt his romantic relationships, for example. Wrt religion, many people get stuck at the magical thinking stage because they're raised in an environment in which others encourage it.

[Mick]

So is non-sequitur'ing...

Tell me: Just what would falsify your position? I can point to stellar, Catholic minds, but you will just shrug that off with your earlier post. So, what exactly do you want from me here? Like, I know you want to sustain your sense of superiority and your smugness, but you don't seem open to serious discussion. So, how about you just press ALT and F4 and call it a day?

[Seth]

Mick, seriously, you are lying about your posts over there.

Not the first whiner who got their ass booted out of Ratskep to come over here and bitch about it, and you won't be the last.

Seen it before, old news, no one cares.

Who are you talking about?

*snicker*

Whoa! I should have checked this thread out earlier, look who dropped by to shit in the pool, 914 him very self. How's the ranting going?

[Mick]

A single person can have well-developed knowledge and skills in one area, and yet still be underdeveloped in others. Einstein's personal life left quite a bit to be desired wrt his romantic relationships, for example. Wrt religion, many people get stuck at the magical thinking stage because they're raised in an environment in which others encourage it.

A single person can have well-developed knowledge and skills in one area, and yet still be underdeveloped in others. Einstein's personal life left quite a bit to be desired wrt his romantic relationships, for example. Wrt secularism or atheism, many people get stuck at the magical thinking stage because they're raised in an environment in which others encourage it.

All I did was change the referent. It is the same, content free, question begging blather.

[Seth]

As a mod, I can tell you that it's all about context. We don't have a rigid system here because some rule violations are worse than others and need to be dealt with accordingly.

And yes, rEv, religiosity is magical thinking, a characteristic of adolescence.

Thanks for admitting you're a mental adolescent, you Atheist dupe you!

[Seth]

Mick, some people deserve to be treated like children.

Yes, you do rEv. Now go get your wubbie and go to bed.

Christians going to an atheist forum and proselytising don't deserve much respect.

Actually they deserve more respect than you do, or any Atheist does. At least they have the courage to venture into the lion's den and argue with the idiots who reside therein.

I'm not trying to excuse Hackenslash's warning, he deserved that. But don't suggest he is the child.

He's an infant, and so are you. You're one of the most notorious shrieking infants I've ever seen. You and 914.

Any adult who believes in God and his stories as strongly as you appear to do, is not really thinking with adult levels of cognition.

And yet Mick presents logical, well-reasoned and articulate arguments while all you do is throw shit at the glass as you hoot and scream like the bald monkey you are.

Now go back to wanking.

[pErvinalia]

So is non-sequitur'ing...

Tell me: Just what would falsify your position? I can point to stellar, Catholic minds, but you will just shrug that off with your earlier post. So, what exactly do you want from me here?

Evidence.

[Seth]

Agree.

I specifically said I didn't think Mick should have been banned.

Apparently the nuance that one can think someone is trolling and should receive a warning, but not be outright banned is lost on Ratskep mods, most of the people in this thread, etc.

Please instruct us vulgar and ignorant proles oh Optimus Prime.
Be the example of nuance you seek.

No, sorry, I'm not going to waste my time swatting flies. This thread, until I get bored, is it.

Predictable and unremarkable.
We'll see if you can hold to that.
My money is on "no".

I'll take that bet...

[pErvinalia]

A single person can have well-developed knowledge and skills in one area, and yet still be underdeveloped in others. Einstein's personal life left quite a bit to be desired wrt his romantic relationships, for example. Wrt religion, many people get stuck at the magical thinking stage because they're raised in an environment in which others encourage it.

A single person can have well-developed knowledge and skills in one area, and yet still be underdeveloped in others. Einstein's personal life left quite a bit to be desired wrt his romantic relationships, for example. Wrt secularism or atheism, many people get stuck at the magical thinking stage because they're raised in an environment in which others encourage it.

All I did was change the referent. It is the same, content free, question begging blather.

It's not, though, as his is backed up by reasoning and evidence. Your statement is clearly ridiculous.

[pErvinalia]

As a mod, I can tell you that it's all about context. We don't have a rigid system here because some rule violations are worse than others and need to be dealt with accordingly.

And yes, rEv, religiosity is magical thinking, a characteristic of adolescence.

Thanks for admitting you're a mental adolescent, you Atheist dupe you!

Eff isn't religious, you Tolerist ( ) dupe you!

[FBM]

A single person can have well-developed knowledge and skills in one area, and yet still be underdeveloped in others. Einstein's personal life left quite a bit to be desired wrt his romantic relationships, for example. Wrt religion, many people get stuck at the magical thinking stage because they're raised in an environment in which others encourage it.

A single person can have well-developed knowledge and skills in one area, and yet still be underdeveloped in others. Einstein's personal life left quite a bit to be desired wrt his romantic relationships, for example. Wrt secularism or atheism, many people get stuck at the magical thinking stage because they're raised in an environment in which others encourage it.

All I did was change the referent. It is the same, content free, question begging blather.

It's not, though, as his is backed up by reasoning and evidence. Your statement is clearly ridiculous.

And further support for my original statement.

[pErvinalia]

Mick, some people deserve to be treated like children.

Yes, you do rEv. Now go get your wubbie and go to bed.

Christians going to an atheist forum and proselytising don't deserve much respect.

Actually they deserve more respect than you do, or any Atheist does. At least they have the courage to venture into the lion's den and argue with the idiots who reside therein.

I'm not trying to excuse Hackenslash's warning, he deserved that. But don't suggest he is the child.

He's an infant, and so are you. You're one of the most notorious shrieking infants I've ever seen. You and 914.

Any adult who believes in God and his stories as strongly as you appear to do, is not really thinking with adult levels of cognition.

And yet Mick presents logical, well-reasoned and articulate arguments while all you do is throw shit at the glass as you hoot and scream like the bald monkey you are.

Now go back to wanking.

Anyway, I don't think you'd know a well-reasoned and articulate argument if you saw one.

[FBM]

As a mod, I can tell you that it's all about context. We don't have a rigid system here because some rule violations are worse than others and need to be dealt with accordingly.

And yes, rEv, religiosity is magical thinking, a characteristic of adolescence.

Thanks for admitting you're a mental adolescent, you Atheist dupe you!

By all means, try to find some religiosity in my position wrt religion(s).